FAMILY PROVISION ACT CLAIMS – Able bodied adult children and Prevailing Community Standards

Author: Dominic Wilson

Publish Date: Nov 24, 2008

A recent decision in the New South Wales Court of Appeal analysed what is ‘proper maintenance education and advancement in life’ for able bodied adult children – SMILEK V PUBLIC TRUSTEE [2008] NSWCA 190.

The case involved the deceased’s two step-sons. The deceased died without a will. There were no competing claims. The estate was small. The step-sons were unsuccessful at first instance before Judge Windeyer who considered he was not able to interfere with the distribution of the deceased’s estate.

The Court of Appeal thought differently and considered it could take into account prevailing community standards.

The stepsons were each middle-aged. Like so many of us, neither had made sufficient provision for retirement. Both were unlikely to be in a position to do so given their particular circumstances which involved the prospects of unemployment and redundancy/early retirement. Each of the step-sons had a close relationship with the deceased and each had made significant non-financial contributions to the deceased’s welfare. The deceased made no provision for either step-son in circumstances where there existed no other claims upon his bounty.

The Court of Appeal took into account prevailing community standards of what is right and appropriate. Each of the step-son’s received 50% of the net residue after payment of the testamentary costs and the significant costs of the litigation.

What the Court of Appeal’s decision demonstrates is the necessity when preparing cases of this sort, to concentrate upon evidence of needs rather than compiling a wish list. Insufficient provision for retirement is a need. The construction of a pergola and a family visit overseas would fall in the category of wish list.

In allowing the appeal the Appeal judges said that wish lists were counterproductive because they diverted the judge’s attention from the real needs of the step-sons, which was for the advancement in life by additional provision for their retirement.

The lesson is to get it right the first time. That is, analyse what are your needs and provide evidence of those needs.

Contact our Managing Partner, Dominic Wilson, on (02) 8268 4000 or by email at craddock@craddock.com.au for friendly professional service. Dominic has more than 25 years experience in this area and heads a team of experienced lawyers.


Back
Book An Appointment Make an Enquiry
A member of our legal team will contact you as soon as possible
*
*
*
Brief description of enquiry:
Type the characters below:
*
Visual verification Refresh Image

a: Level 3, 131 York Street, Sydney NSW 2000 | p: 02 8268 4000 | f: 02 8268 4001 | e: craddock@craddock.com.au
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult a lawyer for individual advice regarding your own situation.
Copyright © 2006-2008 by Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers. View our Privacy Statement